EU Parliamento Rejecit Plan ad Ban aliqua antibiotics ad animal usus

Europae parliamentum heri voted graviter contra rogationem per Germanica vireta ad removendum aliquam antibiotics a album of treatments available for animalibus.

Et rogationem erat additum quod est Emendatione ad Commission scriptor New Anti-microbials ordinacionem, quae est disposito ad auxilium pugna auctus anti-microbial resistentia.

Et vireta arguitur antibiotics sunt etiam facile et late, non solum in humana medicina sed etiam in VETERINARIUS usu, quod crescit verisimilitudo resistentiae, ut medicinae facti minus efficax in tempore.

Medicamenta targeted per Emendatione sunt Polycyxins, Macrolides, fluoroquinolones et tertio et quarta generatione cephalosporins. Omnes eorum pluma in quis est album summum priority discrimine magna antimicrobials ut magna ad occupari resistentia in hominibus.

In Ban opponitur a Foederatum scientia Center in antibiotic resistentia Amcra et a Flandrensis animal Welfare Minister Ben Weyts (VA VA).

'Si enim motus probatus est, multae vitae salvis treatments pro animalibus erit de facto interdictum, "dixit.

Belgiani Mep Tom Vandenkendelare (EPP) monuit de consequatur motus. "Hoc vadit directe contra scientificum consiliis variis Europae agencies," et nuntiavit superbia.

“Veterinarians could only use 20 percent of the existing antibiotic range. People would find it difficult to treat their pets, such as a dog or cat with a banal abscess or farm animals. A near-total ban on critical antibiotics for animals would create human health problems as humans run the risk of infected animals passing on their bacteria. An individualised approach, where one considers on a case-by-case basis which specific animal treatments can be allowed, as is currently the case in Belgium, ut opus melius. "

Denique viride motus victus CDL suffragiorum ad CCIV cum XXXII dis.